Combat Edge Intelligence

Austin Hubbard vs MarQuel Mederos

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

16-10-0Record12-1-1
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'10"Height5'10"
71"Reach69"
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Elevation Fight TeamTeamFactory X

What's at stake

MarQuel Mederos is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +11 while a loss costs more — Austin Hubbard carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Austin HubbardNow 1604
If they win+16→ 1620
If they lose-8→ 1596
MarQuel MederosNow 1714
If they win+11→ 1725
If they lose-21→ 1693

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1624 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1595 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.87
Sig. strikes / min
5.46
44%
Strike accuracy
58%
3.82
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.58
56%
Strike defense
53%
1.59
Takedown avg.
0.23
32%
Takedown accuracy
0%
68%
Takedown defense
83%
0.11
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Austin HubbardMarQuel Mederos
160016501700202420252026

Win method breakdown

5 (31%)
KO/TKO
7 (58%)
2 (13%)
Submission
0 (0%)
9 (56%)
Decision
5 (42%)

Combat Edge model read

MarQuel Mederos92%
Austin Hubbard 8%Elo baseline: 65%

The Combat Edge model makes MarQuel Mederos a 92% favorite over Austin Hubbard in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (65%).

MarQuel Mederos holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1714 to 1604, a 110-point edge.

Austin Hubbard enters on a 4-fight loss streak.

Austin Hubbard finishes 44% of wins inside the distance, MarQuel Mederos 58%.

Austin Hubbard carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.