Combat Edge Intelligence

Bilal Hasan vs John Moraga

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Bilal Hasan
us

Bilal Hasan

“The IndoNinja”

9-0-0FlyweightUFC

1697Good

Tale of the tape

9-0-0Record19-7-0
FlyweightDivisionFlyweight
5'7"Height5'6"
70"Reach66,0"
125 lbsWeight125 lbs

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Bilal HasanNow 1697
If they win+24→ 1721
If they lose-24→ 1673
John MoragaNow 1700
If they win+12→ 1712
If they lose-12→ 1688

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1514 · 9 fightsPre-fight Elo1681 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

28
Sig. strikes / min
2.57
81%
Strike accuracy
44%
4
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.55
57%
Strike defense
56%
0
Takedown avg.
0.62
TBD
Takedown accuracy
23%
0%
Takedown defense
45%
0
Submission avg.
1.07

Trajectory

Bilal HasanJohn Moraga
15501600165017002017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (78%)
KO/TKO
3 (16%)
1 (11%)
Submission
8 (42%)
1 (11%)
Decision
8 (42%)

Combat Edge model read

Bilal Hasan74%
John Moraga 26%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Bilal Hasan a 74% favorite over John Moraga in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans John Moraga's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1697 vs 1700), separated by just 3 points.

Bilal Hasan enters on a 9-fight win streak.

Bilal Hasan finishes 89% of wins inside the distance, John Moraga 58%.

Bilal Hasan carries a 4-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.