Combat Edge Intelligence

Brandon Jenkins vs Kyle Bradley

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Brandon Jenkins
us

Brandon Jenkins

“The Human Highlight Reel”

18-12-0WelterweightKC

1557Solid

Tale of the tape

18-12-0Record20-12-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height5'10"
71"ReachTBD
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
Syndicate MMATeamTeam Voodoo

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Brandon JenkinsNow 1557
If they win+16→ 1573
If they lose-16→ 1541
Kyle BradleyNow 1553
If they win+12→ 1565
If they lose-12→ 1541

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1562 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1495 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.93
Sig. strikes / min
1.99
41%
Strike accuracy
40%
8.05
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.45
33%
Strike defense
59%
0
Takedown avg.
0.65
TBD
Takedown accuracy
50%
27%
Takedown defense
40%
0
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Brandon JenkinsKyle Bradley
15502014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

12 (67%)
KO/TKO
11 (55%)
3 (17%)
Submission
7 (35%)
3 (17%)
Decision
2 (10%)

Combat Edge model read

Brandon Jenkins66%
Kyle Bradley 34%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Brandon Jenkins a 66% favorite over Kyle Bradley in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1557 vs 1553), separated by just 4 points.

Brandon Jenkins finishes 83% of wins inside the distance, Kyle Bradley 90%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.