Combat Edge Intelligence

Bryce Logan vs Nick Ertl

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

13-10-0Record8-6-0
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'9"Height5'9"
70"ReachTBD
156 lbsWeight155 lbs
Power MMA TeamTeamCesar Gracie Fight Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Bryce LoganNow 1540
If they win+16→ 1556
If they lose-16→ 1524
Nick ErtlNow 1537
If they win+16→ 1553
If they lose-16→ 1521

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1553 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1551 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Bryce LoganNick Ertl
1500155020042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (31%)
KO/TKO
3 (38%)
1 (8%)
Submission
3 (38%)
8 (62%)
Decision
2 (25%)

Combat Edge model read

Bryce Logan57%
Nick Ertl 43%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Bryce Logan a 57% favorite over Nick Ertl in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1540 vs 1537), separated by just 3 points.

Bryce Logan enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Nick Ertl enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Bryce Logan finishes 38% of wins inside the distance, Nick Ertl 75%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.