Combat Edge Intelligence

C.J. Keith vs Luan Duarte

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Luan Duarte
br

Luan Duarte

“Mao de Pedra”

14-12-0LightweightCWFC

1459Average

Tale of the tape

8-4-0Record14-12-0
LightweightDivisionLightweight
6'0"Height5'9"
TBDReach-
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Pro BuhaweTeamTata Fight Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

C.J. KeithNow 1452
If they win+24→ 1476
If they lose-24→ 1428
Luan DuarteNow 1459
If they win+16→ 1475
If they lose-16→ 1443

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1561 · 2 fightsPre-fight Elo1515 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

0.86
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
50%
Strike accuracy
TBD
1.82
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
50%
Strike defense
TBD
0
Takedown avg.
TBD
0%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
63%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

C.J. KeithLuan Duarte
1450150020132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

3 (38%)
KO/TKO
12 (86%)
2 (25%)
Submission
0 (0%)
3 (38%)
Decision
2 (14%)

Combat Edge model read

Luan Duarte78%
C.J. Keith 22%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Luan Duarte a 78% favorite over C.J. Keith in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1452 vs 1459), separated by just 7 points.

C.J. Keith enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Luan Duarte enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

C.J. Keith finishes 63% of wins inside the distance, Luan Duarte 86%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.