Combat Edge Intelligence

Chad Robichaux vs Mitch Raposo

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

13-2-0Record11-3-0
FlyweightDivisionFlyweight
5'3"Height5'5"
TBDReach64"
125 lbsWeight125 lbs
Gracie BarraTeamRegiment Training Center

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Chad RobichauxNow 1668
If they win+16→ 1684
If they lose-16→ 1652
Mitch RaposoNow 1669
If they win+16→ 1685
If they lose-16→ 1653

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1518 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1585 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
1.73
TBD
Strike accuracy
37%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.65
TBD
Strike defense
61%
TBD
Takedown avg.
2.54
TBD
Takedown accuracy
38%
TBD
Takedown defense
62%
TBD
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Chad RobichauxMitch Raposo
1650201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
4 (36%)
12 (92%)
Submission
3 (27%)
1 (8%)
Decision
4 (36%)

Combat Edge model read

Mitch Raposo66%
Chad Robichaux 34%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Mitch Raposo a 66% favorite over Chad Robichaux in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1668 vs 1669), separated by just 1 points.

Chad Robichaux enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Mitch Raposo enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Chad Robichaux finishes 92% of wins inside the distance, Mitch Raposo 64%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.