Combat Edge Intelligence

Chad Yard vs Darrell Gholar

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Chad Yard
bb

Chad Yard

“Kid Dangerous”

0-1-0HeavyweightPFL

1472Average

Tale of the tape

0-1-0Record5-6-0
HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'3"Height5'8"
75"ReachTBD
223 lbsWeight198 lbs
Fight FactoryTeamTBD

What's at stake

Darrell Gholar is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +22 while a loss costs more — Chad Yard carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Chad YardNow 1472
If they win+26→ 1498
If they lose-22→ 1450
Darrell GholarNow 1494
If they win+22→ 1516
If they lose-26→ 1468

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1512 · 1 fightsPre-fight Elo1523 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Chad YardDarrell Gholar
14501500200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
3 (60%)
0 (0%)
Submission
1 (20%)
0 (0%)
Decision
1 (20%)

Combat Edge model read

Chad Yard64%
Darrell Gholar 36%Elo baseline: 47%

The Combat Edge model makes Chad Yard a 64% favorite over Darrell Gholar in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Darrell Gholar's way (47%).

Darrell Gholar holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1494 to 1472, a 22-point edge.

Darrell Gholar 80%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.