Combat Edge Intelligence

Chelsea Hackett vs Juliana Miller

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

5-3-1Record5-4-0
FlyweightDivisionFlyweight
5'8"Height5'7"
66"Reach66"
125 lbsWeight125 lbs

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Chelsea HackettNow 1560
If they win+24→ 1584
If they lose-24→ 1536
Juliana MillerNow 1556
If they win+24→ 1580
If they lose-24→ 1532

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1562 · 9 fightsPre-fight Elo1558 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.58
Sig. strikes / min
2.65
51%
Strike accuracy
40%
4.85
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.14
47%
Strike defense
45%
0
Takedown avg.
2.16
TBD
Takedown accuracy
13%
57%
Takedown defense
44%
0
Submission avg.
1.20

Trajectory

Chelsea HackettJuliana Miller
15001550202420252026

Win method breakdown

1 (20%)
KO/TKO
1 (20%)
1 (20%)
Submission
3 (60%)
3 (60%)
Decision
1 (20%)

Combat Edge model read

The Combat Edge model rates this a near coin-flip, splitting Chelsea Hackett and Juliana Miller within a point of even.

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1560 vs 1556), separated by just 4 points.

Chelsea Hackett finishes 40% of wins inside the distance, Juliana Miller 80%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.