Combat Edge Intelligence

Chris de la Rocha vs Matt Adams

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Matt Adams
us

Matt Adams

“Bad”

6-3-0HeavyweightOCL

1560Solid

Tale of the tape

5-3-0Record6-3-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'3"Height5'10"
80,0"Reach75"
243 lbsWeight263 lbs
Forge Combat AcademyTeamRaw MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Chris de la RochaNow 1552
If they win+25→ 1577
If they lose-23→ 1529
Matt AdamsNow 1560
If they win+23→ 1583
If they lose-25→ 1535

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1562 · 8 fightsPre-fight Elo1512 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

4.08
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
46%
Strike accuracy
TBD
6.37
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
44%
Strike defense
TBD
2.02
Takedown avg.
TBD
31%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
33%
Takedown defense
TBD
1.01
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Chris de la RochaMatt Adams
155016002017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

3 (60%)
KO/TKO
5 (83%)
2 (40%)
Submission
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Decision
1 (17%)

Combat Edge model read

Matt Adams60%
Chris de la Rocha 40%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Matt Adams a 60% favorite over Chris de la Rocha in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1552 vs 1560), separated by just 8 points.

Chris de la Rocha finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Matt Adams 83%.

Chris de la Rocha carries a 5-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.