Combat Edge Intelligence

Chris Haseman vs Evan Tanner

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Chris Haseman
au

Chris Haseman

“The Hammer”

20-17-0Light HeavyweightRINGS

1520Average

Tale of the tape

20-17-0Record32-8-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionMiddleweight
5'11"Height6'0"
TBDReachTBD
198 lbsWeight185 lbs
Rings AustraliaTeamHard Knocks Kickboxing

What's at stake

Evan Tanner is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +8 while a loss costs more — Chris Haseman carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Chris HasemanNow 1520
If they win+16→ 1536
If they lose-8→ 1512
Evan TannerNow 1652
If they win+8→ 1660
If they lose-16→ 1636

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1568 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1617 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

0.93
Sig. strikes / min
3.05
70%
Strike accuracy
59%
4.67
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.64
29%
Strike defense
56%
0
Takedown avg.
2.55
TBD
Takedown accuracy
43%
40%
Takedown defense
25%
2
Submission avg.
1.34

Trajectory

Chris HasemanEvan Tanner
15001550160016502006200720082009201020112012

Win method breakdown

2 (11%)
KO/TKO
12 (38%)
14 (74%)
Submission
17 (53%)
3 (16%)
Decision
3 (9%)

Combat Edge model read

Evan Tanner75%
Chris Haseman 25%Elo baseline: 68%

The Combat Edge model makes Evan Tanner a 75% favorite over Chris Haseman in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (68%).

Evan Tanner holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1652 to 1520, a 132-point edge.

Chris Haseman finishes 84% of wins inside the distance, Evan Tanner 91%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.