Combat Edge Intelligence

Claudia Gadelha vs Gillian Robertson

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

18-5-0Record17-9-0
StrawweightDivisionStrawweight
5'3"Height5'5"
TBDReach 63"
115 lbsWeight115 lbs
Luttrell-Yee MMATeamThe Goat Shed Academy· 1666 avg Elo · 8 rated

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Claudia GadelhaNow 1699
If they win+16→ 1715
If they lose-16→ 1683
Gillian RobertsonNow 1695
If they win+12→ 1707
If they lose-12→ 1683

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1645 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1656 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.31
Sig. strikes / min
2.71
42%
Strike accuracy
48%
4.57
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.86
57%
Strike defense
56%
3.03
Takedown avg.
2.76
43%
Takedown accuracy
41%
59%
Takedown defense
39%
0.67
Submission avg.
0.87

Trajectory

Claudia GadelhaGillian Robertson
1650170020192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (11%)
KO/TKO
3 (18%)
7 (39%)
Submission
9 (53%)
9 (50%)
Decision
5 (29%)

Combat Edge model read

Gillian Robertson72%
Claudia Gadelha 28%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Gillian Robertson a 72% favorite over Claudia Gadelha in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Claudia Gadelha's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1699 vs 1695), separated by just 4 points.

Claudia Gadelha finishes 50% of wins inside the distance, Gillian Robertson 71%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.