Combat Edge Intelligence

Costas Philippou vs Matěj Peňáz

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

13-5-0Record11-1-0
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
5'11"Height6'3"
TBDReach83"
185 lbsWeight185 lbs
Bellmore Kickboxing AcademyTeamReinders MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Costas PhilippouNow 1681
If they win+16→ 1697
If they lose-16→ 1665
Matěj PeňázNow 1680
If they win+16→ 1696
If they lose-16→ 1664

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1695 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1508 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.19
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
35%
Strike accuracy
TBD
2.73
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
54%
Strike defense
TBD
0.40
Takedown avg.
TBD
43%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
66%
Takedown defense
TBD
0.27
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Costas PhilippouMatěj Peňáz
1650170020132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (54%)
KO/TKO
10 (91%)
1 (8%)
Submission
0 (0%)
5 (38%)
Decision
1 (9%)

Combat Edge model read

Matěj Peňáz70%
Costas Philippou 30%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Matěj Peňáz a 70% favorite over Costas Philippou in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Costas Philippou's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1681 vs 1680), separated by just 1 points.

Matěj Peňáz enters on a 5-fight win streak.

Costas Philippou finishes 62% of wins inside the distance, Matěj Peňáz 91%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.