Combat Edge Intelligence

Daniel Puder vs Ibragim Magomedov

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Daniel Puder
us

Daniel Puder

8-0-0HeavyweightAmerican Kickboxing Academy

1628Solid

Tale of the tape

8-0-0Record22-8-1
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'3"Height6'0"
TBDReachTBD
235 lbsWeight230 lbs
American Kickboxing AcademyTeamRed Devil Sport Club

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Daniel PuderNow 1628
If they win+24→ 1652
If they lose-24→ 1604
Ibragim MagomedovNow 1629
If they win+12→ 1641
If they lose-12→ 1617

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1491 · 6 fightsPre-fight Elo1586 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Daniel PuderIbragim Magomedov
1600165020072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (25%)
KO/TKO
12 (55%)
3 (38%)
Submission
5 (23%)
3 (38%)
Decision
5 (23%)

Combat Edge model read

The Combat Edge model rates this a near coin-flip, splitting Daniel Puder and Ibragim Magomedov within a point of even.

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1628 vs 1629), separated by just 1 points.

Daniel Puder enters on a 6-fight win streak.

Daniel Puder finishes 63% of wins inside the distance, Ibragim Magomedov 77%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.