Combat Edge Intelligence

Daniel Valderrama vs Zak Bucia

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Zak Bucia
us

Zak Bucia

“Crash”

19-15-0WelterweightFAC

1553Solid

Tale of the tape

2-0-0Record19-15-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
5'8"Height5'10"
-ReachTBD
170 lbsWeight165 lbs
Team Onomeyus MMATeamDragon House

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Daniel ValderramaNow 1551
If they win+24→ 1575
If they lose-24→ 1527
Zak BuciaNow 1553
If they win+12→ 1565
If they lose-12→ 1541

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1500 · 2 fightsPre-fight Elo1561 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Daniel ValderramaZak Bucia
155020222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

1 (50%)
KO/TKO
6 (32%)
0 (0%)
Submission
10 (53%)
1 (50%)
Decision
3 (16%)

Combat Edge model read

Daniel Valderrama79%
Zak Bucia 21%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Daniel Valderrama a 79% favorite over Zak Bucia in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Zak Bucia's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1551 vs 1553), separated by just 2 points.

Daniel Valderrama enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Zak Bucia enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Zak Bucia 84%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.