Combat Edge Intelligence

Davey Grant vs Ruslan Satiev

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Davey Grant
gb-eng

Davey Grant

“Dangerous”

18-8-0BantamweightUFC

1666Good

Tale of the tape

18-8-0Record7-0-0
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
5'8"Height5'6"
69"Reach-
135 lbsWeight135 lbs
Syndicate MMATeamKHK MMA Dagestan

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Davey GrantNow 1666
If they win+16→ 1682
If they lose-16→ 1650
Ruslan SatievNow 1665
If they win+24→ 1689
If they lose-24→ 1641

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1691 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1531 · 7 fights

Tracked stat edges

5.14
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
44%
Strike accuracy
TBD
3.82
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
56%
Strike defense
TBD
1.03
Takedown avg.
TBD
40%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
63%
Takedown defense
TBD
0.17
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Davey GrantRuslan Satiev
16001650202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (22%)
KO/TKO
3 (43%)
9 (50%)
Submission
2 (29%)
5 (28%)
Decision
2 (29%)

Combat Edge model read

Ruslan Satiev60%
Davey Grant 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Ruslan Satiev a 60% favorite over Davey Grant in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Davey Grant's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1666 vs 1665), separated by just 1 points.

Ruslan Satiev enters on a 7-fight win streak.

Davey Grant finishes 72% of wins inside the distance, Ruslan Satiev 71%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.