Combat Edge Intelligence

Douglas Silva de Andrade vs Marcos da Matta

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

29-7-0Record12-3-0
BantamweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'6"Height5'4"
68"ReachTBD
135 lbsWeight145 lbs
Corinthians MMATeamAmerican Top Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Douglas Silva de AndradeNow 1596
If they win+16→ 1612
If they lose-16→ 1580
Marcos da MattaNow 1594
If they win+16→ 1610
If they lose-16→ 1578

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1672 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1474 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.54
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
38%
Strike accuracy
TBD
3.93
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
58%
Strike defense
TBD
0.55
Takedown avg.
TBD
43%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
73%
Takedown defense
TBD
0.18
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Douglas Silva de AndradeMarcos da Matta
160016502017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

20 (69%)
KO/TKO
2 (17%)
2 (7%)
Submission
8 (67%)
7 (24%)
Decision
2 (17%)

Combat Edge model read

Douglas Silva de Andrade53%
Marcos da Matta 47%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Douglas Silva de Andrade a 53% favorite over Marcos da Matta in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1596 vs 1594), separated by just 2 points.

Douglas Silva de Andrade enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Douglas Silva de Andrade finishes 76% of wins inside the distance, Marcos da Matta 83%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.