Combat Edge Intelligence

Eddie Hall vs Wagner da Conceicao Martins

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Eddie Hall
gb-eng

Eddie Hall

“The Beast”

0-0-0Super HeavyweightBOXING

1539Average

Tale of the tape

0-0-0Record12-11-0
Super HeavyweightDivisionSuper Heavyweight
6'3"Height6'7"
-ReachTBD
334 lbsWeight390 lbs

What's at stake

Eddie Hall is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +21 while a loss costs more — Wagner da Conceicao Martins carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Eddie HallNow 1539
If they win+21→ 1560
If they lose-27→ 1512
Wagner da Conceicao MartinsNow 1494
If they win+18→ 1512
If they lose-14→ 1480

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1628 · 1 fightsPre-fight Elo1496 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Eddie HallWagner da Conceicao Martins
15001550202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
10 (83%)
0 (0%)
Submission
1 (8%)
0 (0%)
Decision
1 (8%)

Combat Edge model read

Eddie Hall75%
Wagner da Conceicao Martins 25%Elo baseline: 56%

The Combat Edge model makes Eddie Hall a 75% favorite over Wagner da Conceicao Martins in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (56%).

Eddie Hall holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1539 to 1494, a 45-point edge.

Wagner da Conceicao Martins enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Wagner da Conceicao Martins 92%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.