Combat Edge Intelligence

Eliot Marshall vs Luiz Cane

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Luiz Cane
br

Luiz Cane

“Banha”

17-7-0Light HeavyweightF2N

1638Solid

Tale of the tape

10-4-0Record17-7-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'3"Height6'2"
TBDReachTBD
205 lbsWeight205 lbs
Grudge Training CenterTeamDemian Maia Jiu-Jitsu

What's at stake

Luiz Cane is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +15 while a loss costs more — Eliot Marshall carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Eliot MarshallNow 1613
If they win+17→ 1630
If they lose-15→ 1598
Luiz CaneNow 1638
If they win+15→ 1653
If they lose-17→ 1621

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1582 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1561 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.93
Sig. strikes / min
4.79
27%
Strike accuracy
42%
2.39
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
5
68%
Strike defense
61%
0.47
Takedown avg.
0.56
33%
Takedown accuracy
29%
79%
Takedown defense
100%
0.94
Submission avg.
0.28

Trajectory

Eliot MarshallLuiz Cane
16001650200920102011201220132014201520162017

Win method breakdown

1 (10%)
KO/TKO
15 (88%)
5 (50%)
Submission
0 (0%)
4 (40%)
Decision
2 (12%)

Combat Edge model read

Luiz Cane56%
Eliot Marshall 44%Elo baseline: 54%

The Combat Edge model makes Luiz Cane a 56% favorite over Eliot Marshall in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (54%).

Luiz Cane holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1638 to 1613, a 25-point edge.

Eliot Marshall enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Eliot Marshall finishes 60% of wins inside the distance, Luiz Cane 88%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.