Combat Edge Intelligence

Elise Reed vs Natalie Salcedo

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

8-6-0Record4-2-0
StrawweightDivisionStrawweight
5'3"Height5'0"
63"Reach61"
115 lbsWeight115 lbs

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Elise ReedNow 1538
If they win+17→ 1555
If they lose-15→ 1523
Natalie SalcedoNow 1549
If they win+23→ 1572
If they lose-25→ 1524

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1605 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1524 · 6 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.41
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
53%
Strike accuracy
TBD
3.26
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
52%
Strike defense
TBD
0.46
Takedown avg.
TBD
0%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
53%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Elise ReedNatalie Salcedo
15501600202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (25%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Submission
3 (75%)
6 (75%)
Decision
1 (25%)

Combat Edge model read

Elise Reed53%
Natalie Salcedo 47%Elo baseline: 48%

The Combat Edge model makes Elise Reed a 53% favorite over Natalie Salcedo in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Natalie Salcedo's way (48%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1538 vs 1549), separated by just 11 points.

Elise Reed enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Natalie Salcedo enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Elise Reed finishes 25% of wins inside the distance, Natalie Salcedo 75%.

Elise Reed carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.