Combat Edge Intelligence

Erik Apple vs Wiktor Zalewski

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Erik Apple
us

Erik Apple

“Bad”

10-3-0WelterweightSF

1578Solid

Tale of the tape

10-3-0Record8-3-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height5'11"
TBDReach72"
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
Kings MMATeamWCA Fight Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Erik AppleNow 1578
If they win+16→ 1594
If they lose-16→ 1562
Wiktor ZalewskiNow 1579
If they win+16→ 1595
If they lose-16→ 1563

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1528 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1505 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

0
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
0%
Strike accuracy
TBD
0.54
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
82%
Strike defense
TBD
0
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
0%
Takedown defense
TBD
8.07
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Erik AppleWiktor Zalewski
16001650200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

5 (50%)
KO/TKO
7 (88%)
4 (40%)
Submission
0 (0%)
1 (10%)
Decision
1 (13%)

Combat Edge model read

Wiktor Zalewski66%
Erik Apple 34%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Wiktor Zalewski a 66% favorite over Erik Apple in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1578 vs 1579), separated by just 1 points.

Erik Apple enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Erik Apple finishes 90% of wins inside the distance, Wiktor Zalewski 88%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.