Combat Edge Intelligence

Felipe Arantes vs Mark Antonelli

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

18-10-1Record5-3-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'8"Height6'0"
73,0"Reach-
145 lbsWeight146 lbs
Chute Boxe Diego LimaTeamRonin Training Center

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Felipe ArantesNow 1545
If they win+12→ 1557
If they lose-12→ 1533
Mark AntonelliNow 1542
If they win+24→ 1566
If they lose-24→ 1518

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1584 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1510 · 8 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.37
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
45%
Strike accuracy
TBD
2.66
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
64%
Strike defense
TBD
0.93
Takedown avg.
TBD
47%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
41%
Takedown defense
TBD
0.73
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Felipe ArantesMark Antonelli
1500155020162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (39%)
KO/TKO
1 (20%)
6 (33%)
Submission
2 (40%)
5 (28%)
Decision
2 (40%)

Combat Edge model read

Mark Antonelli63%
Felipe Arantes 37%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Mark Antonelli a 63% favorite over Felipe Arantes in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Felipe Arantes's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1545 vs 1542), separated by just 3 points.

Felipe Arantes enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Felipe Arantes finishes 72% of wins inside the distance, Mark Antonelli 60%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.