Combat Edge Intelligence

Gökhan Aksu vs Nathan Coy

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Gökhan Aksu
tr

Gökhan Aksu

“Abinator”

14-7-1WelterweightOKMMA

1642Solid
Nathan Coy
us

Nathan Coy

“Soulforce”

15-7-0WelterweightUFC

1639Solid

Tale of the tape

14-7-1Record15-7-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
5'8"Height5'10"
-Reach39,0"
158 lbsWeight170 lbs
Hard KnocksTeamAmerican Top Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Gökhan AksuNow 1642
If they win+16→ 1658
If they lose-16→ 1626
Nathan CoyNow 1639
If they win+16→ 1655
If they lose-16→ 1623

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1546 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1586 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
3.88
TBD
Strike accuracy
52%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.40
TBD
Strike defense
62%
TBD
Takedown avg.
3.17
TBD
Takedown accuracy
47%
TBD
Takedown defense
50%
TBD
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Gökhan AksuNathan Coy
1600165020162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

11 (79%)
KO/TKO
3 (20%)
3 (21%)
Submission
4 (27%)
0 (0%)
Decision
8 (53%)

Combat Edge model read

Gökhan Aksu70%
Nathan Coy 30%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Gökhan Aksu a 70% favorite over Nathan Coy in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1642 vs 1639), separated by just 3 points.

Gökhan Aksu finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Nathan Coy 47%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.