Combat Edge Intelligence

Gabriel Lourenço vs Yoshihiro Nakao

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

7-1-0Record9-3-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'3"Height5'11"
-ReachTBD
265 lbsWeight215 lbs
Chute Boxe· 1678 avg Elo · 5 ratedTeamTeam Tackler

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Gabriel LourençoNow 1637
If they win+24→ 1661
If they lose-24→ 1613
Yoshihiro NakaoNow 1642
If they win+16→ 1658
If they lose-16→ 1626

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1494 · 8 fightsPre-fight Elo1608 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Gabriel LourençoYoshihiro Nakao
15501600165020092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

5 (71%)
KO/TKO
4 (44%)
1 (14%)
Submission
2 (22%)
1 (14%)
Decision
3 (33%)

Combat Edge model read

Yoshihiro Nakao60%
Gabriel Lourenço 40%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Yoshihiro Nakao a 60% favorite over Gabriel Lourenço in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1637 vs 1642), separated by just 5 points.

Gabriel Lourenço enters on a 7-fight win streak.

Gabriel Lourenço finishes 86% of wins inside the distance, Yoshihiro Nakao 67%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.