Combat Edge Intelligence

Germaine de Randamie vs Larissa Pacheco

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

10-5-0Record23-4-0
BantamweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'9"Height5'8"
71"Reach69.00"
135 lbsWeight145 lbs
American Kickboxing AcademyTeamJoao Bastos Team

What's at stake

Larissa Pacheco is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +10 while a loss costs more — Germaine de Randamie carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Germaine de RandamieNow 1667
If they win+18→ 1685
If they lose-14→ 1653
Larissa PachecoNow 1712
If they win+10→ 1722
If they lose-14→ 1698

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1625 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1575 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.57
Sig. strikes / min
1.21
47%
Strike accuracy
19%
2
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.14
65%
Strike defense
56%
0
Takedown avg.
0
0%
Takedown accuracy
0%
65%
Takedown defense
0%
0.38
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Germaine de RandamieLarissa Pacheco
1650170020232024

Win method breakdown

4 (40%)
KO/TKO
11 (48%)
1 (10%)
Submission
8 (35%)
5 (50%)
Decision
4 (17%)

Combat Edge model read

Larissa Pacheco72%
Germaine de Randamie 28%Elo baseline: 56%

The Combat Edge model makes Larissa Pacheco a 72% favorite over Germaine de Randamie in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (56%).

Larissa Pacheco holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1712 to 1667, a 45-point edge.

Germaine de Randamie finishes 50% of wins inside the distance, Larissa Pacheco 83%.

Germaine de Randamie carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.