Combat Edge Intelligence

Jack Hermansson vs Thiago Santos

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

24-10-0Record22-13-0
MiddleweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'1"Height6'2"
77"Reach 76"
185 lbsWeight241 lbs
Frontline AcademyTeamTeam Marreta

What's at stake

Jack Hermansson is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +11 while a loss costs more — Thiago Santos carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jack HermanssonNow 1721
If they win+11→ 1732
If they lose-13→ 1708
Thiago SantosNow 1694
If they win+13→ 1707
If they lose-11→ 1683

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1715 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1743 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

5.13
Sig. strikes / min
3.72
45%
Strike accuracy
48%
3.70
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.57
57%
Strike defense
54%
1.50
Takedown avg.
0.88
30%
Takedown accuracy
33%
81%
Takedown defense
66%
0.37
Submission avg.
0.06

Trajectory

Jack HermanssonThiago Santos
170017502022202320242025

Win method breakdown

11 (46%)
KO/TKO
15 (68%)
6 (25%)
Submission
1 (5%)
7 (29%)
Decision
6 (27%)

Combat Edge model read

Jack Hermansson70%
Thiago Santos 30%Elo baseline: 54%

The Combat Edge model makes Jack Hermansson a 70% favorite over Thiago Santos in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (54%).

Jack Hermansson holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1721 to 1694, a 27-point edge.

Jack Hermansson enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Thiago Santos enters on a 4-fight loss streak.

Jack Hermansson finishes 71% of wins inside the distance, Thiago Santos 73%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.