Combat Edge Intelligence

Jack McCloughlin vs Marcus Kowal

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

2-1-0Record5-1-1
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
TBDHeight5'7"
-ReachTBD
135 lbsWeight135 lbs
Atherton Submission WrestlingTeamWerdum Combat Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jack McCloughlinNow 1560
If they win+24→ 1584
If they lose-24→ 1536
Marcus KowalNow 1558
If they win+24→ 1582
If they lose-24→ 1534

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1507 · 4 fightsPre-fight Elo1482 · 6 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Jack McCloughlinMarcus Kowal
1500155020192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

1 (33%)
KO/TKO
1 (20%)
1 (33%)
Submission
3 (60%)
1 (33%)
Decision
1 (20%)

Combat Edge model read

Jack McCloughlin56%
Marcus Kowal 44%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Jack McCloughlin a 56% favorite over Marcus Kowal in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1560 vs 1558), separated by just 2 points.

Jack McCloughlin enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Marcus Kowal enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Jack McCloughlin finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Marcus Kowal 80%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.