Combat Edge Intelligence

Jade Masson-Wong vs Tyra Parker

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Tyra Parker
us

Tyra Parker

“The Honey Badger”

4-5-0FlyweightGC

1489Average

Tale of the tape

3-3-0Record4-5-0
FlyweightDivisionFlyweight
5'4"Height5'3"
63"ReachTBD
125 lbsWeight125 lbs
Nova Gym Centre Fitness MMATeamVictory MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jade Masson-WongNow 1498
If they win+23→ 1521
If they lose-25→ 1473
Tyra ParkerNow 1489
If they win+25→ 1514
If they lose-23→ 1466

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1532 · 6 fightsPre-fight Elo1501 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Jade Masson-WongTyra Parker
150020132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

1 (33%)
KO/TKO
1 (25%)
0 (0%)
Submission
3 (75%)
2 (67%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Jade Masson-Wong56%
Tyra Parker 44%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Jade Masson-Wong a 56% favorite over Tyra Parker in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1498 vs 1489), separated by just 9 points.

Jade Masson-Wong enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Jade Masson-Wong finishes 33% of wins inside the distance, Tyra Parker 100%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.