Combat Edge Intelligence

Jailton Almeida vs Parker Porter

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

22-5-0Record13-9-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'4"Height6'0"
79"Reach75"
241 lbsWeight256 lbs
Galpao da LutaTeamUnderdog Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu

What's at stake

Jailton Almeida is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +8 while a loss costs more — Parker Porter carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jailton AlmeidaNow 1771
If they win+8→ 1779
If they lose-24→ 1747
Parker PorterNow 1575
If they win+24→ 1599
If they lose-8→ 1567

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1717 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1598 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.25
Sig. strikes / min
6.55
66%
Strike accuracy
50%
1.02
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
6.32
36%
Strike defense
52%
6.66
Takedown avg.
1.35
63%
Takedown accuracy
26%
60%
Takedown defense
67%
1.98
Submission avg.
0.45

Trajectory

Jailton AlmeidaParker Porter
160017001800202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

8 (36%)
KO/TKO
6 (46%)
13 (59%)
Submission
3 (23%)
1 (5%)
Decision
4 (31%)

Combat Edge model read

Jailton Almeida89%
Parker Porter 11%Elo baseline: 76%

The Combat Edge model makes Jailton Almeida a 89% favorite over Parker Porter in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (76%).

Jailton Almeida holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1771 to 1575, a 196-point edge.

Jailton Almeida enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Jailton Almeida finishes 95% of wins inside the distance, Parker Porter 69%.

Jailton Almeida carries a 4-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.