Combat Edge Intelligence

Jake Paul vs Matthew O'Rourke

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Jake Paul
us

Jake Paul

“The Problem Child”

12-2-0Light HeavyweightBoxing

1408Developing

Tale of the tape

12-2-0Record0-1-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'1"Height-
71" Reach-
191 lbsWeight205 lbs
TBDTeamTeam Ryano Waterford

What's at stake

Matthew O'Rourke is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +20 while a loss costs more — Jake Paul carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jake PaulNow 1408
If they win+28→ 1436
If they lose-20→ 1388
Matthew O'RourkeNow 1471
If they win+20→ 1491
If they lose-28→ 1443

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1550 · 8 fightsPre-fight Elo1503 · 1 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Jake PaulMatthew O'Rourke
14001450200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (58%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Submission
0 (0%)
5 (42%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Matthew O'Rourke66%
Jake Paul 34%Elo baseline: 59%

The Combat Edge model makes Matthew O'Rourke a 66% favorite over Jake Paul in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (59%).

Matthew O'Rourke holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1471 to 1408, a 63-point edge.

Jake Paul finishes 58% of wins inside the distance.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.