Combat Edge Intelligence

Jake Woodley vs Luiz Cane

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Luiz Cane
br

Luiz Cane

“Banha”

17-7-0Light HeavyweightF2N

1638Solid

Tale of the tape

8-1-0Record17-7-0
MiddleweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'0"Height6'2"
-ReachTBD
186 lbsWeight205 lbs
Team BodyshopTeamDemian Maia Jiu-Jitsu

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jake WoodleyNow 1636
If they win+24→ 1660
If they lose-24→ 1612
Luiz CaneNow 1638
If they win+16→ 1654
If they lose-16→ 1622

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1488 · 9 fightsPre-fight Elo1561 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
4.79
TBD
Strike accuracy
42%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
5
TBD
Strike defense
61%
TBD
Takedown avg.
0.56
TBD
Takedown accuracy
29%
TBD
Takedown defense
100%
TBD
Submission avg.
0.28

Trajectory

Jake WoodleyLuiz Cane
155016001650201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

3 (38%)
KO/TKO
15 (88%)
1 (13%)
Submission
0 (0%)
4 (50%)
Decision
2 (12%)

Combat Edge model read

Jake Woodley63%
Luiz Cane 37%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Jake Woodley a 63% favorite over Luiz Cane in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Luiz Cane's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1636 vs 1638), separated by just 2 points.

Jake Woodley enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Jake Woodley finishes 50% of wins inside the distance, Luiz Cane 88%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.