Combat Edge Intelligence

James Gallagher vs Micah Miller

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Micah Miller
us

Micah Miller

“Maverick”

21-9-0FeatherweightiKON

1639Solid

Tale of the tape

12-3-0Record21-9-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'9"Height6'1"
64"ReachTBD
145 lbsWeight145 lbs
SBG IrelandTeamAmerican Top Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

James GallagherNow 1639
If they win+16→ 1655
If they lose-16→ 1623
Micah MillerNow 1639
If they win+12→ 1651
If they lose-12→ 1627

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1570 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1537 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
1.65
TBD
Strike accuracy
35%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.20
TBD
Strike defense
54%
TBD
Takedown avg.
1.45
TBD
Takedown accuracy
43%
TBD
Takedown defense
21%
TBD
Submission avg.
1.45

Trajectory

James GallagherMicah Miller
16502023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
6 (29%)
9 (75%)
Submission
11 (52%)
3 (25%)
Decision
4 (19%)

Combat Edge model read

James Gallagher66%
Micah Miller 34%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes James Gallagher a 66% favorite over Micah Miller in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1639 vs 1639), separated by just 0 points.

James Gallagher enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

James Gallagher finishes 75% of wins inside the distance, Micah Miller 81%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.