Combat Edge Intelligence

James Gallagher vs Tobias Harila

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Tobias Harila
se

Tobias Harila

“Bad Intention”

13-4-0FeatherweightFCR

1639Solid

Tale of the tape

12-3-0Record13-4-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'9"Height5'9"
64"ReachTBD
145 lbsWeight145 lbs
SBG IrelandTeamVasteras Fight Club

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

James GallagherNow 1639
If they win+16→ 1655
If they lose-16→ 1623
Tobias HarilaNow 1639
If they win+16→ 1655
If they lose-16→ 1623

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1570 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1504 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
0
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

James GallagherTobias Harila
165020222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
11 (85%)
9 (75%)
Submission
0 (0%)
3 (25%)
Decision
2 (15%)

Combat Edge model read

James Gallagher60%
Tobias Harila 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes James Gallagher a 60% favorite over Tobias Harila in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1639 vs 1639), separated by just 0 points.

James Gallagher enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

James Gallagher finishes 75% of wins inside the distance, Tobias Harila 85%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.