
James Te Huna vs Nate Marquardt
Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.
Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape
What's at stake
Nate Marquardt is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +11 while a loss costs more — James Te Huna carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.
Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.
Opponent quality
Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.
Tracked stat edges
Elo Trajectory
Win method breakdown
Combat Edge model read
The Combat Edge model makes James Te Huna a 53% favorite over Nate Marquardt in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Nate Marquardt's way (44%).
Nate Marquardt holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1651 to 1610, a 41-point edge.
James Te Huna enters on a 4-fight loss streak.
James Te Huna finishes 81% of wins inside the distance, Nate Marquardt 78%.
Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.