Combat Edge Intelligence

Jason Gilliam vs Nathan Jones

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Nathan Jones
gb-eng

Nathan Jones

“Mr. Bag & Tag”

17-13-0WelterweightFSC

1530Average

Tale of the tape

15-9-0Record17-13-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height6'0"
TBDReach73"
169 lbsWeight170 lbs
Team WolfpackTeamGeat Britian Top Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jason GilliamNow 1529
If they win+16→ 1545
If they lose-16→ 1513
Nathan JonesNow 1530
If they win+12→ 1542
If they lose-12→ 1518

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1542 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1522 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

0.79
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
33%
Strike accuracy
TBD
3.14
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
43%
Strike defense
TBD
0
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
0%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Jason GilliamNathan Jones
15001550201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

10 (67%)
KO/TKO
1 (6%)
5 (33%)
Submission
13 (76%)
0 (0%)
Decision
3 (18%)

Combat Edge model read

Nathan Jones66%
Jason Gilliam 34%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Nathan Jones a 66% favorite over Jason Gilliam in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1529 vs 1530), separated by just 1 points.

Jason Gilliam finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Nathan Jones 82%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.