Combat Edge Intelligence

John MaCalolooy vs Nam Phan

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Nam Phan
us

Nam Phan

21-17-0FeatherweightACB

1539Average

Tale of the tape

4-1-0Record21-17-0
BantamweightDivisionFeatherweight
TBDHeight5'6"
N/AReachTBD
135 lbsWeight141 lbs
Dragons Den MMATeamNam Phan MMA Academy

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

John MaCalolooyNow 1536
If they win+24→ 1560
If they lose-24→ 1512
Nam PhanNow 1539
If they win+12→ 1551
If they lose-12→ 1527

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1515 · 6 fightsPre-fight Elo1567 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
4.52
TBD
Strike accuracy
38%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
6.55
TBD
Strike defense
59%
TBD
Takedown avg.
0.18
TBD
Takedown accuracy
18%
TBD
Takedown defense
61%
TBD
Submission avg.
0.18

Trajectory

John MaCalolooyNam Phan
155016002015201620172018201920202021202220232024

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
8 (38%)
0 (0%)
Submission
6 (29%)
4 (100%)
Decision
7 (33%)

Combat Edge model read

John MaCalolooy60%
Nam Phan 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes John MaCalolooy a 60% favorite over Nam Phan in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Nam Phan's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1536 vs 1539), separated by just 3 points.

Nam Phan enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

John MaCalolooy finishes 0% of wins inside the distance, Nam Phan 67%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.