Combat Edge Intelligence

John Marsh vs Matheus Scheffel

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
John Marsh
us

John Marsh

“The Bull”

8-7-0HeavyweightBF

1518Average

Tale of the tape

8-7-0Record17-11-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'0"Height6'2"
TBDReachTBD
222 lbsWeight262 lbs
Team Neutral GroundsTeamCM System

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

John MarshNow 1518
If they win+16→ 1534
If they lose-16→ 1502
Matheus ScheffelNow 1521
If they win+12→ 1533
If they lose-12→ 1509

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1626 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1611 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.20
Sig. strikes / min
1.33
51%
Strike accuracy
36%
5.20
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3
40%
Strike defense
47%
1
Takedown avg.
0
100%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
55%
Takedown defense
100%
1
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

John MarshMatheus Scheffel
15001550160020062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

3 (38%)
KO/TKO
12 (71%)
4 (50%)
Submission
0 (0%)
1 (13%)
Decision
5 (29%)

Combat Edge model read

The Combat Edge model rates this a near coin-flip, splitting John Marsh and Matheus Scheffel within a point of even.

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1518 vs 1521), separated by just 3 points.

John Marsh enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Matheus Scheffel enters on a 5-fight loss streak.

John Marsh finishes 88% of wins inside the distance, Matheus Scheffel 71%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.