Combat Edge Intelligence

José Medina vs Mark Weir

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Mark Weir
gb-eng

Mark Weir

“The Wizard”

21-18-1MiddleweightSFC

1537Average

Tale of the tape

11-7-0Record21-18-1
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
6'0"Height6'2"
74″ReachTBD
185 lbsWeight185 lbs
Phuket Fight ClubTeamRange

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

José MedinaNow 1536
If they win+16→ 1552
If they lose-16→ 1520
Mark WeirNow 1537
If they win+12→ 1549
If they lose-12→ 1525

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1561 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1552 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.16
Sig. strikes / min
1.80
37%
Strike accuracy
64%
5.07
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.38
47%
Strike defense
38%
0.40
Takedown avg.
0
33%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
28%
Takedown defense
25%
0
Submission avg.
3.23

Trajectory

José MedinaMark Weir
155016002011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

8 (73%)
KO/TKO
11 (52%)
2 (18%)
Submission
9 (43%)
1 (9%)
Decision
1 (5%)

Combat Edge model read

José Medina70%
Mark Weir 30%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes José Medina a 70% favorite over Mark Weir in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Mark Weir's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1536 vs 1537), separated by just 1 points.

José Medina enters on a 5-fight loss streak.

José Medina finishes 91% of wins inside the distance, Mark Weir 95%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.