Combat Edge Intelligence

Kanako Murata vs Randa Markos

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Randa Markos
ca

Randa Markos

“Quiet Storm”

11-11-1StrawweightUFC

1557Solid

Tale of the tape

12-3-0Record11-11-1
StrawweightDivisionStrawweight
5'1"Height5'5"
34,0"ReachTBD
115 lbsWeight115 lbs
Combat Sports AcademyTeamMichigan Top Team

What's at stake

Kanako Murata is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +12 while a loss costs more — Randa Markos carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Kanako MurataNow 1654
If they win+12→ 1666
If they lose-20→ 1634
Randa MarkosNow 1557
If they win+20→ 1577
If they lose-12→ 1545

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1539 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1634 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.15
Sig. strikes / min
2.97
57%
Strike accuracy
44%
2.40
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.10
53%
Strike defense
59%
3.38
Takedown avg.
1.12
56%
Takedown accuracy
29%
100%
Takedown defense
53%
0.75
Submission avg.
0.20

Trajectory

Kanako MurataRanda Markos
15501600165017002020202120222023

Win method breakdown

2 (17%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
4 (33%)
Submission
4 (36%)
6 (50%)
Decision
7 (64%)

Combat Edge model read

Kanako Murata78%
Randa Markos 22%Elo baseline: 64%

The Combat Edge model makes Kanako Murata a 78% favorite over Randa Markos in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (64%).

Kanako Murata holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1654 to 1557, a 97-point edge.

Kanako Murata enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Kanako Murata finishes 50% of wins inside the distance, Randa Markos 36%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.