Combat Edge Intelligence

Leonardo Damiani vs Wiktor Zalewski

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

12-7-1Record8-3-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
5'10"Height5'11"
TBDReach72"
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
Aurora MMA· 1581 avg Elo · 5 ratedTeamWCA Fight Team· 1652 avg Elo · 3 rated

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Leonardo DamianiNow 1580
If they win+16→ 1596
If they lose-16→ 1564
Wiktor ZalewskiNow 1579
If they win+16→ 1595
If they lose-16→ 1563

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1522 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1505 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.67
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
24%
Strike accuracy
TBD
4.17
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
38%
Strike defense
TBD
0
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
50%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Leonardo DamianiWiktor Zalewski
1550160016502023202420252026

Win method breakdown

3 (25%)
KO/TKO
7 (88%)
6 (50%)
Submission
0 (0%)
3 (25%)
Decision
1 (13%)

Combat Edge model read

Wiktor Zalewski61%
Leonardo Damiani 39%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Wiktor Zalewski a 61% favorite over Leonardo Damiani in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Leonardo Damiani's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1580 vs 1579), separated by just 1 points.

Leonardo Damiani enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Leonardo Damiani finishes 75% of wins inside the distance, Wiktor Zalewski 88%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.