AdvertisementRemove ads — go Premium
Combat Edge Intelligence

Luan Lacerda vs Shane Campbell

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

13-4-0Record24-8-0
BantamweightDivisionLightweight
5'7"Height6'0"
71"Reach71,0"
135 lbsWeight155 lbs
Nova UniaoTeamShaolin Muay Thai

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Luan LacerdaNow 1652
If they win+16→ 1668
If they lose-16→ 1636
Shane CampbellNow 1651
If they win+12→ 1663
If they lose-12→ 1639

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1563 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1549 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

Tracked UFC statistics may not cover a fighter's full career. Unavailable measurements are not zero.

4.52
Sig. strikes / min
3.99
44%
Strike accuracy
60%
7.07
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.19
48%
Strike defense
55%
1.26
Takedown avg.
1.36
25%
Takedown accuracy
29%
75%
Takedown defense
82%
0.63
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Luan LacerdaShane Campbell
1650202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
9 (38%)
11 (85%)
Submission
6 (25%)
2 (15%)
Decision
9 (38%)

Combat Edge model read

Luan Lacerda57%
Shane Campbell 43%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Luan Lacerda a 57% favorite over Shane Campbell in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1652 vs 1651), separated by just 1 points.

Luan Lacerda finishes 85% of wins inside the distance, Shane Campbell 63%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.