Combat Edge Intelligence

Luis Pena vs Matt Wiman

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Luis Pena
us

Luis Pena

“Violent Bob Ross”

12-6-0WelterweightAFS

1640Solid
Matt Wiman
us

Matt Wiman

“Handsome”

16-10-0LightweightUFC

1604Solid

Tale of the tape

12-6-0Record16-10-0
WelterweightDivisionLightweight
6'3"Height5'10"
TBDReach68,0"
161 lbsWeight155 lbs

What's at stake

Luis Pena is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +14 while a loss costs more — Matt Wiman carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Luis PenaNow 1640
If they win+14→ 1654
If they lose-18→ 1622
Matt WimanNow 1604
If they win+13→ 1617
If they lose-11→ 1593

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1577 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1638 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.66
Sig. strikes / min
3.17
47%
Strike accuracy
50%
3.12
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.57
51%
Strike defense
51%
1.17
Takedown avg.
2.13
33%
Takedown accuracy
38%
48%
Takedown defense
56%
1.17
Submission avg.
1.54

Trajectory

Luis PenaMatt Wiman
16001650170020202021202220232024

Win method breakdown

3 (25%)
KO/TKO
4 (25%)
5 (42%)
Submission
5 (31%)
4 (33%)
Decision
7 (44%)

Combat Edge model read

Luis Pena74%
Matt Wiman 26%Elo baseline: 55%

The Combat Edge model makes Luis Pena a 74% favorite over Matt Wiman in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (55%).

Luis Pena holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1640 to 1604, a 36-point edge.

Matt Wiman enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Luis Pena finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Matt Wiman 56%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.