Combat Edge Intelligence

Magomed Umalatov vs Shamil Musaev

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Shamil Musaev
ru

Shamil Musaev

“Silent Assassin”

18-1-1WelterweightPFL

1780Great

Tale of the tape

18-1-0Record18-1-1
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'1"Height5'10"
75"Reach71"
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
Eagles MMATeamGolden Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Magomed UmalatovNow 1779
If they win+16→ 1795
If they lose-16→ 1763
Shamil MusaevNow 1780
If they win+16→ 1796
If they lose-16→ 1764

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1629 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1632 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Magomed UmalatovShamil Musaev
175018002023202420252026

Win method breakdown

12 (67%)
KO/TKO
12 (67%)
2 (11%)
Submission
2 (11%)
4 (22%)
Decision
4 (22%)

Combat Edge model read

Shamil Musaev60%
Magomed Umalatov 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Shamil Musaev a 60% favorite over Magomed Umalatov in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1779 vs 1780), separated by just 1 points.

Magomed Umalatov finishes 78% of wins inside the distance, Shamil Musaev 78%.

Magomed Umalatov carries a 4-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.