Combat Edge Intelligence

Matt Wiman vs TJ Grant

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Matt Wiman
us

Matt Wiman

“Handsome”

16-10-0LightweightUFC

1605Solid

Tale of the tape

16-10-0Record21-5-0
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'10"Height5'10"
68,0"ReachTBD
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Skrap PackTeamFit Plus

What's at stake

TJ Grant is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +14 while a loss costs more — Matt Wiman carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Matt WimanNow 1605
If they win+14→ 1619
If they lose-10→ 1595
TJ GrantNow 1653
If they win+14→ 1667
If they lose-18→ 1635

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1639 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1648 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.17
Sig. strikes / min
3.95
50%
Strike accuracy
54%
3.57
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.21
51%
Strike defense
57%
2.13
Takedown avg.
1.63
38%
Takedown accuracy
44%
56%
Takedown defense
37%
1.54
Submission avg.
0.58

Trajectory

Matt WimanTJ Grant
1550160016502011201220132014201520162017201820192020

Win method breakdown

4 (25%)
KO/TKO
4 (19%)
5 (31%)
Submission
13 (62%)
7 (44%)
Decision
4 (19%)

Combat Edge model read

TJ Grant72%
Matt Wiman 28%Elo baseline: 57%

The Combat Edge model makes TJ Grant a 72% favorite over Matt Wiman in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (57%).

TJ Grant holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1653 to 1605, a 48-point edge.

Matt Wiman enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

TJ Grant enters on a 5-fight win streak.

Matt Wiman finishes 56% of wins inside the distance, TJ Grant 81%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.