Combat Edge Intelligence

Matthew O'Rourke vs Rick Roufus

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Rick Roufus
us

Rick Roufus

“The Jet”

4-6-0Light HeavyweightC3

1438Developing

Tale of the tape

0-1-0Record4-6-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
-Height6'0"
-ReachTBD
205 lbsWeight205 lbs
Team Ryano WaterfordTeamTBD

What's at stake

Matthew O'Rourke is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +22 while a loss costs more — Rick Roufus carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Matthew O'RourkeNow 1471
If they win+22→ 1493
If they lose-26→ 1445
Rick RoufusNow 1438
If they win+26→ 1464
If they lose-22→ 1416

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1503 · 1 fightsPre-fight Elo1514 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Matthew O'RourkeRick Roufus
14501500200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
2 (50%)
0 (0%)
Submission
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Decision
2 (50%)

Combat Edge model read

Matthew O'Rourke72%
Rick Roufus 28%Elo baseline: 55%

The Combat Edge model makes Matthew O'Rourke a 72% favorite over Rick Roufus in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (55%).

Matthew O'Rourke holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1471 to 1438, a 33-point edge.

Rick Roufus enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Rick Roufus 50%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.