Combat Edge Intelligence

Mukhamad Vakhaev vs Paul Elliott

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

13-9-1Record8-2-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'0"Height6'1"
-Reach-
266 lbsWeight246 lbs
Fight Club Akhmat· 1682 avg Elo · 20 ratedTeamTFT MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Mukhamad VakhaevNow 1609
If they win+16→ 1625
If they lose-16→ 1593
Paul ElliottNow 1607
If they win+24→ 1631
If they lose-24→ 1583

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1625 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1494 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Mukhamad VakhaevPaul Elliott
1500155016001650202420252026

Win method breakdown

6 (46%)
KO/TKO
8 (100%)
5 (38%)
Submission
0 (0%)
2 (15%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Paul Elliott52%
Mukhamad Vakhaev 48%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Paul Elliott a 52% favorite over Mukhamad Vakhaev in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Mukhamad Vakhaev's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1609 vs 1607), separated by just 2 points.

Mukhamad Vakhaev enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Paul Elliott enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Mukhamad Vakhaev finishes 85% of wins inside the distance, Paul Elliott 100%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.