Combat Edge Intelligence

Nathan Trepagnier vs Ray Hayes

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Ray Hayes
us

Ray Hayes

“Sweet Baby”

9-2-0WelterweightLFA

1641Solid

Tale of the tape

5-6-0Record9-2-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
5'7"Height6'0"
67" Reach-
160 lbsWeight170 lbs
Academy of Martial ArtsTeamArsenal Elite

What's at stake

Ray Hayes is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +10 while a loss costs more — Nathan Trepagnier carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Nathan TrepagnierNow 1505
If they win+22→ 1527
If they lose-10→ 1495
Ray HayesNow 1641
If they win+10→ 1651
If they lose-22→ 1619

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1529 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1510 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Nathan TrepagnierRay Hayes
1500155016001650202420252026

Win method breakdown

1 (20%)
KO/TKO
6 (67%)
2 (40%)
Submission
3 (33%)
2 (40%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Ray Hayes92%
Nathan Trepagnier 8%Elo baseline: 69%

The Combat Edge model makes Ray Hayes a 92% favorite over Nathan Trepagnier in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (69%).

Ray Hayes holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1641 to 1505, a 136-point edge.

Ray Hayes enters on a 3-fight win streak.

Nathan Trepagnier finishes 60% of wins inside the distance, Ray Hayes 100%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.