Combat Edge Intelligence

Nikolas Motta vs Trey Ogden

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Trey Ogden
us

Trey Ogden

“Shamurai”

18-7-0LightweightUFC

1666Good

Tale of the tape

15-6-0Record18-7-0
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'8"Height5'11"
70"Reach72"
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Nova UniaoTeamMarathon MMA

What's at stake

Trey Ogden is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +15 while a loss costs more — Nikolas Motta carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Nikolas MottaNow 1642
If they win+17→ 1659
If they lose-15→ 1627
Trey OgdenNow 1666
If they win+15→ 1681
If they lose-17→ 1649

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1599 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1618 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.64
Sig. strikes / min
3.20
37%
Strike accuracy
50%
4.50
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.49
56%
Strike defense
56%
0
Takedown avg.
1.89
TBD
Takedown accuracy
33%
82%
Takedown defense
100%
0
Submission avg.
0.73

Trajectory

Nikolas MottaTrey Ogden
16501700202320242025

Win method breakdown

10 (67%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Submission
11 (61%)
5 (33%)
Decision
7 (39%)

Combat Edge model read

Nikolas Motta60%
Trey Ogden 40%Elo baseline: 47%

The Combat Edge model makes Nikolas Motta a 60% favorite over Trey Ogden in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Trey Ogden's way (47%).

Trey Ogden holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1666 to 1642, a 24-point edge.

Nikolas Motta finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Trey Ogden 61%.

Trey Ogden carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.