Combat Edge Intelligence

Paul Hughes vs Rafael dos Anjos

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Paul Hughes
ie

Paul Hughes

“Big News”

14-3-0WelterweightPFL

1713Good

Tale of the tape

14-3-0Record32-17-0
WelterweightDivisionLightweight
5'9"Height5'8"
70"Reach70"
159 lbsWeight155 lbs
Fight Academy IrelandTeamRDA Academy

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Paul HughesNow 1713
If they win+16→ 1729
If they lose-16→ 1697
Rafael dos AnjosNow 1713
If they win+12→ 1725
If they lose-12→ 1701

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1625 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1737 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
3.48
TBD
Strike accuracy
47%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.23
TBD
Strike defense
60%
TBD
Takedown avg.
1.95
TBD
Takedown accuracy
36%
TBD
Takedown defense
55%
TBD
Submission avg.
0.57

Trajectory

Paul HughesRafael dos Anjos
17001750202320242025

Win method breakdown

7 (50%)
KO/TKO
5 (16%)
3 (21%)
Submission
11 (34%)
4 (29%)
Decision
16 (50%)

Combat Edge model read

Paul Hughes71%
Rafael dos Anjos 29%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Paul Hughes a 71% favorite over Rafael dos Anjos in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1713 vs 1713), separated by just 0 points.

Rafael dos Anjos enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Paul Hughes finishes 71% of wins inside the distance, Rafael dos Anjos 50%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.