Combat Edge Intelligence

Reed Parrish vs Todd Medina

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Todd Medina
us

Todd Medina

“El Tiburon”

11-9-0Light HeavyweightRMMA

1515Average

Tale of the tape

0-0-0Record11-9-0
HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'2"Height5'10"
-ReachTBD
245 lbsWeight205 lbs
Kratos Athletic CenterTeamCarlson Gracie Jiu-Jitsu

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Reed ParrishNow 1529
If they win+23→ 1552
If they lose-25→ 1504
Todd MedinaNow 1515
If they win+17→ 1532
If they lose-15→ 1500

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1500 · 1 fightsPre-fight Elo1517 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Reed ParrishTodd Medina
1450150020072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
3 (27%)
0 (0%)
Submission
7 (64%)
0 (0%)
Decision
1 (9%)

Combat Edge model read

Reed Parrish63%
Todd Medina 37%Elo baseline: 52%

The Combat Edge model makes Reed Parrish a 63% favorite over Todd Medina in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (52%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1529 vs 1515), separated by just 14 points.

Todd Medina enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Todd Medina 91%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.