Combat Edge Intelligence

Roberto Romero vs Timmy Cuamba

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Timmy Cuamba
us

Timmy Cuamba

“Twilight Timmy”

10-4-0FeatherweightUFC

1649Solid

Tale of the tape

8-5-1Record10-4-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'7"Height5'8"
70"Reach71"
155 lbsWeight145 lbs
Team OyamaTeamXtreme Couture

What's at stake

Timmy Cuamba is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +13 while a loss costs more — Roberto Romero carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Roberto RomeroNow 1576
If they win+19→ 1595
If they lose-13→ 1563
Timmy CuambaNow 1649
If they win+13→ 1662
If they lose-19→ 1630

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1538 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1592 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

4.93
Sig. strikes / min
2.77
48%
Strike accuracy
44%
8.07
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.58
43%
Strike defense
58%
0
Takedown avg.
1.31
TBD
Takedown accuracy
32%
67%
Takedown defense
72%
0
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Roberto RomeroTimmy Cuamba
160016502023202420252026

Win method breakdown

3 (38%)
KO/TKO
5 (50%)
2 (25%)
Submission
0 (0%)
3 (38%)
Decision
5 (50%)

Combat Edge model read

Timmy Cuamba71%
Roberto Romero 29%Elo baseline: 60%

The Combat Edge model makes Timmy Cuamba a 71% favorite over Roberto Romero in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (60%).

Timmy Cuamba holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1649 to 1576, a 73-point edge.

Roberto Romero enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Roberto Romero finishes 63% of wins inside the distance, Timmy Cuamba 50%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.